In a recent discussion between theologians Mullins and Craig, the topic of divine simplicity took center stage. Mullins emphasized the growing interest in this stronger doctrine, asserting that it’s the theological concept du jour. The conversation delved into whether there is any biblical evidence supporting this idea.

Divine simplicity posits that God lacks any composition or distinct parts. Craig, however, firmly asserts that there is no biblical foundation for this stronger doctrine. In fact, he goes a step further, deeming it not merely unbiblical but positively anti-biblical. Craig contends that the Bible provides insight into several essential properties of God. These include goodness, holiness, omnipotence, omniscience, omnipresence, and eternality. According to him, these are not mere abstract concepts but fundamental aspects of God’s nature as revealed in Scripture.

God’s Essential Properties: A Biblical Revelation

The theologian argues that the Bible serves as a divine revelation, offering a comprehensive understanding of God’s essential attributes. These properties, ranging from His goodness to His eternal nature, form the bedrock of the scriptural depiction of God. A critical point of contention arises regarding the assertion that God possesses no potentiality. Craig firmly rejects this notion, highlighting the scriptural evidence that God, being all-powerful, has the potential to act in various ways. This challenges the concept of divine simplicity, as it suggests that God’s potentiality is not only evident but extensive and boundless.

In this theological discourse, Craig takes a bold stance against the prevailing trend of embracing divine simplicity as a central doctrine. His argument challenges theologians to reconsider the scriptural basis for their beliefs, asserting that the stronger doctrine not only lacks biblical support but goes against the very essence of the revealed nature of God.

In unraveling the intricacies of divine simplicity, Craig invites a reexamination of theological assumptions, urging scholars to align their doctrines more closely with the rich tapestry of biblical teachings.

Source: Theological Discussion between Mullins and Craig