A brief summary of their beliefs.
– Followers of this belief hold that the Lord God’s election is limited to Israel alone. They create a division based on biological descent. One group is considered children of God, His covenant people, and the other is considered children of the devil.
– They believe that the devil had relations with certain women, resulting in the group of children of the devil. Thus, trying to convert them with the gospel is futile.
– They consider figures like Cain as the first person of color, conceived through the seed of Satan. Similar views include the “Jesus only” group, who see other Satanic descendants like Gam, from whom the yellow and black (Cushitic) races supposedly originated.
– Two other patriarchs of this group were Ismael, from whom the Arab nations are believed to have originated, and Esau. Jacob and Esau were in Rebekah’s womb, one fathered by Isaac and the other by Satan.
– The division of tribes plays a significant role in their thinking. On one side are Judah and Benjamin, who intermingled with the descendants of Esau, while the other ten tribes of Israel are on the other side.
– They expand the concept of Israel to include all white nations of the West, leading to the idea of White Israelism and White Theology.
– With the Babylonian Exile, Judea lost its crown, which was transferred to England and continued through the British royal house.
– Words like “covenant land” (Berit-aian) refer to Britain, and the Saxons are believed to be Isaac’s sons.
– The “lost sheep of the house of Israel” mentioned by Jesus (Matthew 10:5-6) are seen as the white peoples of Western Europe.
– They claim that the corrupted Jews in Palestine who rejected Jesus fled to Russia. In the 8th century, the Turkish Khazars converted to Judaism and mixed with Russian Jews, giving rise to the current Jews in modern-day Israel, whom they consider to be these corrupted Khazar tribes. They assert that only a small group of Jews in Israel, the Sephardim Jews, are considered pure.
They quote Bible verses and apply them to countries and tribes of Israel:
– Zebulun – Holland – Genesis 49:13, Deuteronomy 33:18-19
– Ephraim – England – Genesis 49:24, 1 Kings 9:5
– Manasseh – USA – Genesis 27:28-29, Deuteronomy 33:13-17
– Asher – France – Deuteronomy 33:24, Genesis 49:20, Judges 5:17
– Dan – Denmark – Genesis 49:17
– Naphtali – Belgium – Genesis 49:21, Matthew 4:13
– Judah – South Africa – Joshua 15:1&2, Genesis 49:11, Genesis 49:9, Lamentations 2:13, Lamentations 4:7&8 (Leaders white, but will become black), Daniel 12:7, Isaiah 9:20 (Manasseh – America, Ephraim – England will oppress Judah – South Africa)
They teach about mixed and black nations and their influence:
– They believe that black nations are two-legged animals and consume human flesh. They serve humans (Jeremiah 27:6) and can engage in sexual relations with humans (Leviticus 20:25). These creatures can communicate with God and repent for their sins (Jonah 3:8).
They also insist that only the Hebrew names for God can be used:
– They reject the name Jesus, claiming it comes from Greek mythology as Je Zeus (son of Zeus). They exclusively use names like Yahweh, Elohim, Yashua, and Messiah.
Rebirth refers to physical birth from God (in contrast to being born from Satan) and they oppose the teachings of Luke and Paul:
– They claim that Paul did not see a vision but suffered from sunstroke.
– They assert that Paul was not a scholar of the law and had his own gospel, free from circumcision and the law.
– They believe that Luke follows Paul and indulges in imagination.
– They argue that Paul contradicts the Messiah Himself.
This text reflects the views of a specific group, and it is essential to understand that these beliefs are not widely accepted or representative of mainstream Christian teachings.
The beliefs of the followers of Israelvisie, also known as the Israel Truth or British-Israelism, are based on a unique interpretation of biblical texts and historical events. It is important to note that Israelvisie is not a widely accepted or mainstream Christian belief but rather a fringe movement with a limited following.
Key beliefs of Israelvisie followers include:
1. British-Israel Identity: Israelvisie adherents believe that the Anglo-Saxon and related peoples of Northwestern Europe, particularly the British and Americans, are the direct descendants of the “lost tribes” of Israel. They claim that these tribes migrated and settled in Europe after their exile by the Assyrians in the 8th century BCE. This belief holds that modern-day white Europeans are the true Israelites of the Bible, and their nations are the inheritors of God’s promises to ancient Israel.
2. God’s Covenant with Israel: Israelvisie followers assert that God’s covenant and promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel) were not exclusively for the Jewish people but extended to the Anglo-Saxon and related nations. They see themselves as God’s chosen people and believe that their nations have a special destiny and divine protection.
3. National Identity: They believe that each nation has a specific role in fulfilling God’s plan, and their national identity is intricately linked to biblical prophecies. They associate certain biblical tribes with specific modern nations, as outlined in their earlier points about attributing biblical names to various European countries.
4. Rejection of Mainstream Christianity: Israelvisie followers often reject the teachings of mainstream Christianity, arguing that it is corrupted and does not accurately interpret the Bible. They consider themselves part of a “remnant” or “true church” that adheres to the “Israelite truth” as revealed through their unique interpretations.
5. Apocalyptic and End Times Views: Some followers of Israelvisie hold apocalyptic views, believing that their nations will play a central role in the end times and the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. They may see events in the world as fulfilling biblical prophecies, aligning with their belief in the special role of their nations.
6. Emphasis on Race and Heritage: Israelvisie followers often place a strong emphasis on racial identity and heritage, arguing that their genealogy and ancestry are critical to understanding their role as God’s chosen people.
It is essential to recognize that the beliefs of Israelvisie are not widely accepted among Christians and are often considered fringe or even controversial. Mainstream Christian denominations and biblical scholars do not support the claims of British-Israelism, and the theological community views it as a distortion of biblical teachings. It is crucial to approach these beliefs with a discerning and critical perspective and to engage in respectful dialogue when discussing theological matters.
What do Biblical Scholars say about British-Israelism?
Biblical scholars and theologians generally view British-Israelism, also known as Israelvisie or British-Israel Identity, as a fringe and non-mainstream belief system. They consider it to be a form of pseudoscience and pseudohistory rather than a legitimate biblical interpretation. The majority of mainstream Christian scholars and theologians do not endorse or support the claims made by British-Israelism adherents.
Here are some key points and criticisms raised by biblical scholars regarding British-Israelism:
1. Lack of Historical and Archaeological Evidence: British-Israelism’s claim that certain modern European nations are the direct descendants of the “lost tribes” of Israel is not supported by credible historical or archaeological evidence. There is no conclusive scientific or genetic proof connecting the Anglo-Saxon people to ancient Israel.
2. Selective Interpretation of Scripture: British-Israelism relies heavily on selective interpretations of biblical texts, cherry-picking verses and passages to fit their preconceived beliefs. This approach often ignores historical and cultural contexts, leading to flawed conclusions.
3. Misuse of Prophecy: The movement often reads modern geopolitical events into biblical prophecies, attempting to fit them into their narrative. However, this practice is subjective and can lead to misinterpretations of prophetic passages.
4. Lack of Support from Mainstream Christian Traditions: The majority of Christian denominations and theological institutions do not endorse British-Israelism. The belief is considered a fringe movement and is not taken seriously by mainstream theologians.
5. Rejection of Traditional Christian Teachings: British-Israelism often rejects mainstream Christian doctrines and teachings, including the divinity of Jesus Christ, the Holy Trinity, and salvation through faith in Christ alone.
6. Racial and Nationalistic Overtones: Critics argue that British-Israelism emphasizes racial and nationalistic identities, which can lead to exclusionary and ethnocentric beliefs. This focus on race contradicts the biblical teaching of the universal love and salvation offered through Jesus Christ.
7. Disputed Historical Claims: Some of the historical claims made by British-Israelism, such as linking the British monarchy to King David or claiming that the Stone of Scone used in coronations is the same stone Jacob used in the Bible, are highly disputed and lack credible evidence.
In summary, biblical scholars view British-Israelism as an unsound and unconvincing interpretation of the Bible, driven more by nationalist and ethnocentric ideologies than by solid historical or scriptural evidence. It is essential to approach such beliefs with a critical and discerning mindset and to rely on the consensus of reputable biblical scholarship within mainstream Christianity.
You can also read: Die Israelvisie Geskryf deur Prof. Gerrit Smit